[清空]播放記錄
視頻
提示:如無(wú)法播放請(qǐng)看其他線路
The second highest grossing film of 1950 in USA, trailing only behind Cecil B. DeMille’s SAMSON AND DELILAH (1949), KING SOLOMON’S MINES, for what it is worth, is a supernal Technicolor spectacle that brings to the forefront the biosphere of the African continent and unveils the mystique of its indigenous mankind tribes (namely, the Kipsigi Tribe and the Watussi Tribe in Kenya Colony),
Taking oceanic liberty with H. Rider Haggard’s popular source novel - for example, the female protagonist is purely the scenarist’s invention - Compton Bennett and Andrew Marton’s film (allegedly the latter replaced the former due to some internal discontent among the crew) hews subserviently to Hollywood’s romanticizing trope as if the exotic land itself isn’t a fecund enough soil to keep audience rapt, who are mad keen to spectate a faraway Continent opening up to them for the first time, could they care less of the burning passion between British safari guide Allan Quatermain (Granger) and his demure client Elizabeth Curtis (Kerr), a married British lady looking for her missing husband, presumably lost in his quest for the titular treasure.
That said, Granger and Kerr actually contribute more than what they are allotted to - i.e. the tedious battle of sexes under the backdrop of a terra incognita, their chemistry is torridly felt (and infamously consummated offscreen). Even saddled with a risibly inexplicable hairdo makeover, Kerr’s Ms. Curtis is ravishing to behold, showered in the polychromatic glamor, and a swarthy, husky Granger is well togged up as a proto-Indiana Jones type, not batting an eyelid in the face of whatever adversity, who also diligently utters Kipsigi language as if it is his second nature.
Save for the opening elephant-hunting stunt, which looks callously cruel to today’s optics, KING SOLOMON’S MINES downplays the colonialism influence and largely portrays the white people as rubberneckers rather than interlopers of the tribal affairs, although the major upheaval they witness is the overthrow of a current king by an eligible challenger, which betrays an occidental perception towards the primordial civilization and also works as an implicit harbinger of what will happen once the outside world encroaches upon their territory.
For the continent’s fauna and flora, the film really breaks a sweat to capture them on camera, so are the tribal dances and close-up portraiture of tribespeople’s individual distinction. The stampede sequences are noticeably manipulated into wholeness by post-production. The ensuing thrill is inevitably dented notwithstanding, the crew’s Herculean undertaking and technique bravura remains grandly meritorious and awe-inspiring.
In all fairness, KING SOLOMON’S MINES is less a treasure hunting escapade than a broad travelogue about a foreign land, it contains enough footage to pique your curiosity, but, like most commodities from the Hollywood assembly line, however exquisite it looks, it is lensed through an exoticized, mythicized “white gaze”. There is a mental resistance to truly knowing these strangely donned and extraordinarily looking human beings, any attempt of a deeper communication between two different races is snuffed on the drawing board, why is that? This could be today’s food for thought.
referential entries: John Ford’s MOGAMBO (1953, 6.2/10); Steven Spielberg’s INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM (1984, 7.2/10); James Gray’s THE LOST CITY OF Z (2016, 7.7/10).
Title: King Solomon’s Mines
Year: 1950
Genre: Adventure, Action, Romance
Country: USA
Language: English, Zulu
Directors: Compton Bennett, Andrew Marton
Screenwriter: Helen Deutsch
Based on the novel by H. Rider Haggard
Music: Mischa Spoliansky
Cinematography: Robert Surtees
Editors: Conrad A. Nervig, Ralph E. Winters
Cast:
Deborah Kerr
Stewart Granger
Richard Carlson
Kimursi
Siriaque
Hugo Haas
Lowell Gilmore
Baziga
Sekaryongo
Rating: 6.8/10
畫(huà)面滿分,情節(jié)和表演都不錯(cuò),為啥打分那么低豆瓣還真是偏心啊……
本片圍繞非洲大地的生態(tài)環(huán)境和人文社會(huì)展開(kāi),探險(xiǎn)與寶藏的氛圍沒(méi)有那么濃厚。
很努力描摹非洲之美,但拍成科教片了。
2.5星,人物性格的塑造太平了,基本上沒(méi)有任何的深度,本應(yīng)該是很引人入勝的小說(shuō)卻被拍的沉悶乏味,也只能獵奇下非洲的奇景和動(dòng)物了,要么就是看看寇爾這個(gè)大美女滾泥漿。。。PS再一次覺(jué)得寇爾比凱利要美多了。。。
面對(duì)人數(shù)占有的非洲酋長(zhǎng)沒(méi)有足夠的勇氣,智慧是完不成任何事情的。在面對(duì)強(qiáng)大的自然環(huán)境面前,你所學(xué)所懂的東西一文不值
可以簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng):英勇鎮(zhèn)定的非洲通白人,跟他的拖油瓶們--不?;ㄈ菔腄eborah Kerr、不停秀下限的小黑呆。Technicolor。以真實(shí)不浮誇的非洲描述,堆高男女主角的性別張力與愛(ài)情火苗,策略與執(zhí)行不差,但好像只有這招;全片嚴(yán)格說(shuō)來(lái)沒(méi)有大高潮,角色曲線也簡(jiǎn)單,最後居然收在黑人部落的酋長(zhǎng)之爭(zhēng)。
沖著kerr看的 比較“傻逼”的非洲異域風(fēng)情冒險(xiǎn)獵奇片
樂(lè)視:[內(nèi)嵌繁體中文字幕][彩色][奧斯卡]所羅門(mén)王的寶藏1950版.像素240P
這哪是冒險(xiǎn),這根本就是旅游嘛!還有這渣畫(huà)質(zhì)和時(shí)不時(shí)的暫停,看在年代古老的份上,我忍了。
非洲動(dòng)物大聯(lián)歡啊……
很多動(dòng)物。。。
很久以前看過(guò)的,知道馬賽人就是通過(guò)這部電影。
7分,雖然劇本很一般很一般,但本片展現(xiàn)出的非洲風(fēng)土人情和鏡頭下的野生動(dòng)物還是非常吸引人的,本片的攝影給本片加分不少,看慣了文明社會(huì)的影片后偶爾看看這類(lèi)型的電影也挺舒適的,而且本片本身也算是一部還不錯(cuò)的影片,劇情邏輯沒(méi)有太大的漏洞,拍攝難度放到那個(gè)年代來(lái)看還是挺大的,雖然有些地方很五毛特效,有些地方有明顯的剪輯拼接痕跡,但總的來(lái)說(shuō)還是瑕不掩瑜吧。本片的表演倒是沒(méi)什么可說(shuō)的,表演難度幾乎沒(méi)有。最后想說(shuō)的是其實(shí)本片真的適合叫非洲探險(xiǎn)記而不是所羅門(mén)王寶藏,所羅門(mén)王寶藏就是個(gè)龍?zhí)?/p>
如果不是女主glamorous到完全不像戶外人士,這片子就是動(dòng)物世界+野外生存節(jié)目了。實(shí)地拍攝的非洲景觀壯美又刺激,一看就是必須在影院看的視覺(jué)大片,配上說(shuō)得過(guò)去的劇情,有懸疑有動(dòng)作戲,男帥女美談?wù)剳賽?ài)……What's not to like. 看Kerr演這種無(wú)腦美人總有些不適,這部比起愛(ài)情喜劇里還更無(wú)腦一點(diǎn)。不過(guò)人美就好咯。
。為了救回父親,伊麗莎白,梅特蘭小姐找上了經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富的導(dǎo)游艾倫,夸特曼以及他的同伴們,他們必須隨時(shí)保持警惕,與大自然以及這些狂徒們周旋
http://www.bilibili.com/video/av10765672/
真的!除了風(fēng)景其實(shí)沒(méi)什麼好看
一點(diǎn)不夸張的說(shuō) 每出現(xiàn)一種動(dòng)物 我的雞皮疙瘩就落一地 全身難受。。真的太多動(dòng)物了 most of all都會(huì)咬人都很可怕?。?!很難相信Kerr拍完這部之后居然還想接the African queen。。這女人是得多膽大心細(xì)熱愛(ài)大自然且喜歡表演??!不過(guò)這部里她的造型是真美啊 尤其是那小劉海 簡(jiǎn)直滿分!整個(gè)人粉嫩可愛(ài)又不失女人味~
難道就我一個(gè)人覺(jué)得好看嗎 異域風(fēng)情觀光大片